
GL MONTHLY e-NEWSLETTER -
October 2009
Brought to you by Jeff Thoren, DVM, ACC
True transparency is rare. Many individuals and organizations pay lip service to
values of openness and candor, but too often these are hollow promises. Claiming
to be transparent is not the same as being transparent, so what is
transparency and what does it really look like in practice?
For information to flow freely within an organization, people must feel free to
speak openly, and leaders must welcome such openness. Leaders are susceptible to
thinking they know more than they really do. Successful leaders make a point of
seeking out crucial but hard-to-take facts, things they may bristle at hearing -
and that subordinates too often, and understandably, play down, disguise, or
ignore.
Here’s
this month’s feature ...
Creating a Transparent
Culture by Warren Bennis, Daniel Goleman and Patricia Ward Biederman
Leader to Leader, No. 50, Fall 2008
Highlights from the article:
-
Transparency and creating a culture of candor depends on the free flow of
information within an organization and between the organization and its many
stakeholders. The organization's effectiveness depends on this flow of
information. Its capacity to compete, solve problems, innovate, meet
challenges, and achieve goals - its intelligence, if you will - varies to
the degree that the information flow remains healthy.
-
There may have been a time when an imperial leader could know everything an
organization needed to be successful. But if such a time ever existed, it is
long gone. Today, the information an organization needs may be located
anywhere, including outside. And the leader who has a narrow view of proper
channels for information often pays a high price for its orderly but
insufficient flow.
-
Despite legitimate moral and legal limits on disclosure, leaders should at
least aspire to a policy of "no secrets." The first beneficiaries of such a
policy are the members of the organization itself, who are in a position to
act on maximum rather than restricted information.
-
There seems to be an inexorable filtering out of bad news that often leaves
those in the highest positions with potentially disastrous information gaps.
The higher leaders rise, the less honest feedback they get from others about
their leadership. Direct reports understandably hesitate to enumerate the
boss's leadership failings. And so top leaders easily lose touch with the
ways others see them and may remain poor listeners, abrasive, tuned out, or
otherwise clueless about their own limitations.
-
The wisest leaders seek broad counsel from people at every level. Those
closest to the action usually know more about what's actually going on with
clients or customer service than do those at the top. There's truth to the
maxim, "None of us is as smart as all of us" so effective leaders find ways
to elicit many points of view.
-
Leaders have to do more than just ask for input. They have to hear it. All
of us would do well to reflect on how receptive we are to the suggestions
and opinions of others and alternate points of view. Leaders often believe
they are wiser than all those around them. Unfortunately, the
self-confidence of those that rise to the top can easily blur into a blind
spot, an unwillingness to turn to others for advice.
-
A key question everyone should ask to encourage candor: "Is it safe to bring
bad news to those in leadership?" The first time “the boss” blows up or
punishes someone delivering bad news, a norm is established. Everyone
quickly realizes that it is folly to speak unwanted truth to power, no
matter how crucial the information may be.
-
Leaders must show that speaking up is not just safe but mandatory, and that
no information of substance is out of bounds. It is not always easy for even
the most confident leaders to embrace hard truths, especially when they are
presented awkwardly by someone who is neither a friend nor a trusted
colleague. But failing to hear critical information, whoever delivers it,
may put the entire enterprise at risk.
For the
full text article, go to ...
http://www.leadertoleader.org/knowledgecenter/journal.aspx?ArticleID=741
How to Surface Undiscussables
Creating a transparent culture means developing the skill to surface and
respectfully talk about “undiscussables” – key issues that people are afraid of
talking about openly, but that must be addressed for the team or organization to
successfully move forward.
Here are
the top 10 tips from The Thin Book of Naming Elephants: How to Surface
Undiscussables for Greater Organizational Success for discussing these “undiscussables.”
-
Start small:
Ask at the end of each meeting: What didn't we talk about today that we
should have? What should we do about it? Go around the room and ask everyone
to speak.
-
Check your
gut:
Pay attention to your gut feelings. If you feel strongly about something,
chances are someone else does too. Speak up.
-
Use tentative
language:
Say it like this: "I'm not sure if I have this right, but I see it this way
or I am concerned about..."
-
Use
contrasting language:
Say it like this: "What I am not saying is... What I am saying is..."
-
First,
determine your intent:
Why do you want to speak up? Who benefits more? You or the organization? If
it's all about you, think it over again.
-
Build the
business case:
What is the potential impact both good and bad to the organization of the
specific undiscussable? Be concrete about how it could affect the
organization's goals or image.
-
Don't make it
personal:
People ask us, "what if the undiscussable is a person?" Define it as actions
impacting the organization, not as someone's personality, style or
characteristics.
-
If the
undiscussable is arrogant leadership:
Try to engage the arrogant person in dialogue about multiple alternatives.
Arrogant people often do not realize they are being arrogant so if you can
get them to talk, their curiosity may kick in.
-
Surface the
assumptions you are relying on:
Say: "Here's how I thought. I assumed... because of... What do you see
differently?"
-
Ask the 6
what's:
"What do we know? What do we not know? What will we never know? What can we
agree on? What do we disagree on? What do we need to do to move forward?"
Next Month
Open, frequent and constructive communication is one of the keys to sustainable
success. Yet most organizational communication is broken. It tends to be more
one-way than interactive; more talking than listening; more advocacy and less
inquiry; little room for integrating opposing points of view. We’ll explore how
to address this dilemma and to create sustainable transformation through
dialogue.
To
receive this FREE monthly e-Newsletter via e-mail go to our e-Newsletter
Sign-Up Page. Please
feel free to pass the e-newsletter along to your colleagues, friends and family.
|