
GL MONTHLY e-NEWSLETTER -
November 2009
Brought to you by Jeff Thoren, DVM, ACC
Open, frequent and constructive communication is one of the keys to sustainable
success. Yet most organizational communication is broken. It tends to be more
one-way than interactive; more talking than listening; more advocacy and less
inquiry; little room for integrating opposing points of view.
Organizations are networks of relationships – and breakdowns in interpersonal
interactions and communications are a frequent occurrence. This month, we’ll
explore how to address this dilemma and how the behaviors associated with the
practice of dialogue are powerful tools for developing the capacity for deep,
authentic conversation.
Here’s
this month’s feature ...
Sustainable
Transformation through Dialogue by Deepika Nath
From The Linkage Leader – Linkage, Inc., 2009
Highlights from the article:
-
Dialogue is a conversation between equals. It is more than one person’s
understanding; it makes the implicit explicit – whether assumptions, values
or intentions that control and drive behavior; and builds collective meaning
and community. Dialogue is inherently relational and collaborative.
-
Dialogue is a framework where participants speak simply, authentically and
from the heart, and listen openly, attentively and with respect. Four key
behaviors are involved:
-
Voicing
requires the courage to speak your ideas and the courage to hold a
silence – to know what is really worthy of being spoken. The key
questions: “What needs to be said” and “Who will speak for me if I don’t
speak for myself”.
-
Listening
is attending to the spoken and unspoken aspects of the conversation, the
tone, the reactions and feelings – listening with “more than our ears”.
It requires letting go of resistance, and silencing the inner chatter of
the mind.
-
Respecting
is the willingness and ability to honor the other(s), and respecting
differences without needing to fix them or bring them to resolution. It
requires deep inquiry to understand the other’s intention.
-
Suspending
one’s judgment is not to defend or advocate for one’s position but to
keep an open mind and inquire into the position of another – the
experiences, assumptions and beliefs that contribute to this position.
Suspending judgment leads to trust and safety, allowing open, honest and
authentic communication.
- Ensuring that each person in turn has a chance to (without
interruption) voice “what needs to be said” from their perspective.
- Allowing for some silence for reflection between speakers.
- Being honest and authentic when speaking.
- Being deeply present and attentive when listening.
-
Being
succinct while still allowing for spontaneous expression.
-
High performing teams are characterized by strong communication and a
commitment to the success and growth of the team members. Dialogue enables
the creation of a safe and trusting culture within the team where there is a
genuine effort to listen to dissenting points of view without reacting and
to engage in a process of inquiry to understand the basis for differences in
perspective. This results in shared learning and growth.
-
As the business environment becomes more complex, a single individual simply
does not have all the requisite knowledge to succeed. By necessity there
must be reliance on collective intelligence. Through conversation, people
are able to create, refine and share their knowledge. Dialogue provides a
mind-set for real conversations and also contributes to creating an
environment of safe risk taking and learning.
For the
full text article, go to ...
http://www.linkageinc.com/thinking/linkageleader/Documents/
Deepika_Nath_Sustainable_Transformation_Through_Dialogue.pdf
Getting Reality on the Table
Who owns the truth about what’s “real” in a company or business? The answer?
Every single person in the company, including entry level employees, owns a
piece of the truth about what’s really going on. The operative word is piece. No
one, not even the business owner, owns the entire truth, because no one can be
in all places at all times.
One of the goals of dialogue is to get everyone’s reality out on the table, so
it can be considered. Everyones! Until the multiple - sometimes conflicting -
realities of key individuals and constituents have been explored, implementing a
plan can be a decidedly tentative endeavor.
To the degree that you resist or disallow the exploration of differing realities
in your workplace and at home, you will spend time, money, energy, and emotion
cleaning up the aftermath of plans quietly but effectively torpedoed by
individuals who resent the fact that their experience, opinions, and strongly
held beliefs are apparently of little interest to those “in power.”
Here is a three step process to insure that you are considering multiple
perspectives:
-
Make a
proposal.
Identify the issue on the table and, if you have a solution in mind, make a
proposal. Say, “This is the issue and this is what it looks like from where
I stand, and this is what I propose we do about it.”
-
Check for
understanding.
Invite questions. Say, “before we go any further, please ask any clarifying
questions you may have.” If you notice someone who is silent but looks
puzzled or concerned, draw them into the conversation.
-
Check for
agreement.
Openly and actively encourage people to share opposing views and resist the
temptation to defend your idea immediately. Say something like, “I believe
this is the right way to go, the right course of action. But I suspect some
of you may see it differently. If you do, I’d like to hear it. I know that
my enthusiasm may make it hard to challenge me, but my job is to make the
best possible decision for the business, not to persuade you to my
viewpoint. So please speak up.” Then ask each person to share their
thoughts.
What’s the payoff for examining multiple realities? People learn to think. When
reality is thoroughly examined, participants often walk out of the meeting with
ideas that no single individual had walking in.
Source: Fierce Conversations by Susan Scott
Next Month
Almost everywhere we turn, trust is on the decline. Trust in our culture at
large, in our institutions, and in our companies is significantly lower than a
generation ago. “Trust makes the world go ‘round,” and right now we’re
experiencing a crisis of trust. So just how do leaders go about building
organizational trust?
To
receive this FREE monthly e-Newsletter via e-mail go to our e-Newsletter
Sign-Up Page. Please
feel free to pass the e-newsletter along to your colleagues, friends and family.
|